Review of One Film Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Review of One Film - Research Paper compositors caseThis paper assesses the film for its cultural and historical value by examining the photograph from the creative thinker for the film, the skeletoning of the script, production and post-production exposure and results. Film critic and freelance journalist, Josh Winning (2010) provides thorough insight into binding fable for endure to the Future. According to Winning (2010), the idea for the film originated with producer Bob Gale and writer/director Robert Zemickis. some(prenominal) Gale and Zemickis had produced a few films together and had always wanted to produce a time travel film. The idea for Back to the Future originated with Gale back in 1980 when he visited his parents and came across his fathers high indoctrinate yearbook. Gale found himself wondering what kind of a high school teen his father was and speculated over how he might have reacted to his father had he attended school with him. It was this thinking that gave birth to the idea for Back to the Future (Winning, 2010). Upon his return to Los Angeles, Gale pitched the idea to Zemickis, who speculated over what Gales mother might have been akin in highschool and the idea for Back to the Future was complete. Together, Gale and Zemichis took their idea to Columbia Pictures and a developmental proclamation was signed and the two began working on outlineing a script. The script was designed to transport 17 year old Marty back to a time when his parents were teens in high school. This meant that Marty would have to go back to the 1950s, an important time in American history and culture development. This was an era in which teens gained some family of economic power and freedom and became empowered (Winning, 2010). The first draft for the script was completed in 1981 and have Marty as a video pirate and the time machine was largely a fridge. A stake draft in 1981 changed Marty to a wannabe rock star and modernised the time machine (Winni ng, 2010). Ian Nathan (2010) of conglomerate magazine provides insight into the making of the film Back to the Future by interviewing Gale and Zemickis and executive producer Steven Spielberg who worked with the draft scripts. According to Spielberg, the first draft was a bit too clean and would not hold up against the raunchy comedies that were currently dominating the box office. Moreover, the time machine seemed so stationery and would have had particular mobility for the time traveller. On this basis, the first draft was rejected by Columbia Pictures and a more unstable time machine with wheels was devised for the second draft which was shopped around. The script went back and forth between studios and Gale and Zemickis at least forty times before a final draft with an acceptable level of edginess was achieved. Spielberg acted as an advisor, mediating between various studios and Gale and Zemickis, trying to preserve the integrity of Gale and Zemickis ideas and helping them to finally sell the final draft to Universal Pictures (Nathan, 2010). Upon accepting the draft, Sid Sheinberg at Universal made three notes to the script. First, the character Dr. Emmett Brown could not be called professor as that would be too corny (Nathan, 2010). Secondly, Browns mascot could not be a chimpanzee as no movie with a chimpanzee in it has ever been a hit. Thirdly, the movie championship had to be changed from Back to the Future to Spaceman from Pluto. However, Gale and Zemickis would not agree to a movie title change and with Spielberg