History Gcse Vietnam Coursework Essay

Source A is by US President Johnson, speaking in April 1965, adept month after the appear of Operation Rolling Thunder. It is a primary etymon. Johnson had a difficult none he had to live up to be popular. The former professorship JFK was very(prenominal) popular. Johnson was a new president. He launched the aspire involvement former president all sent weapons and advisers. In the blood, Johnson says USA got involved in Vietnam because we lay d suffer a promise to keep. By saying promise he is referring to the Truman Doctrine. It is the promise made by Truman president of USA after founding contend Two, they promised to send money, weapons and advisers to the countries step upside the Iron Curtain if they argon over the threat of collectivism. Johnson feels that he has to carry on the promise. the Statesns expect Johnson to help out South Vietnamese. the Statesns call communism is evil, and they are the defender of democracy and capitalism. They regain it6 is the ir job to contain communism. They have showed to the world that they will stand up over communism in Korea, Cuba and Greece it is vital that they carry on containing communism to get ahead the States appear strong.The inauguration is say to public in America. It is expedient because it is from the president himself who lead the fight which make fors it is primary stemma because it was said at the time the contend was going on. In addition, it gives us the reasons that Johnson told the public. It in like manner tells us the official reason of wherefore America was involved in the warfare. Because Johnson took them to war, many public believed him. Direct involvement has just begun and the incidents at disconnection of Tongking and Pleiku were the excuses for America to bomb North Vietnam.The kickoff is little useful because he doesnt give a specific reason on why America was involved he does non talk about the direct involvement, he is trying to justify his reasons on b ombing Vietnam. He believes it is the dear thing to do he hides his hush-hush feelings. He besides says the commendation from the bible to back him up. Hitherto shalt thou come, but no gain he says that the god will say he is doing the right thing. He is trying to make people feel it is the moral thing. He also means that he dont necessity communism to be over the Iron Curtain. Because the views from the Vietnamese people are missing it make the fount slight useful. It is biased because we precisely get Johnsons maneuver of view.The date is signifi crowd outt and it is said to persuade the public and it makes the base much likely to be propaganda. Johnson is desperate to put the public on giving medications side. Because if the authorities does not get the support from the public thither will be a massive protest. The source only shows Johnsons point of view so we dont get along if the Vietnamese wanted America thither. Johnson has just show uped to bomb Vietnam whic h makes it less reliable because he is trying to put the public on governments side.This is not uncommon because it is what the otherwise(a) leaders have done in the chivalric to put the public on their side. Because it is common that makes it les reliable the politicians can blow up the reasons why they have gone to the war. Propaganda has been used in World state of war 2 and more(prenominal) recently in Iraq and Afghanistan and the public have to be cautious when listening to propaganda speeches. The media is trying to make the public believe that communism is bad.The source on its have got is not very useful. Perhaps if it was cross-examined with other sources we will be able to understand more about the reasons of why America got involved in the Vietnam War.Source B is a private conversation said by us President Johnson in may 1964. The source tells us that Johnsons business concern of communism of course if you hook on running from the communists they may chase you i nto your own kitchen which is similar to source A in the situation that he talks about communism ventilation to the West and America. He also tells us that he has a fear of losing power which he doesnt mention in source A because it is a public conversation.He says that the politicians and advisers are giving him pressure to start the war which means that JFK was doing is not working anymore. The source was spoken in May 1964 but then the Operation Rolling Thunder hadnt started. The USA was only helping the Vietnamese indirectly. The date is significant because it shows that he had thought about bombing Vietnam, it wasnt a decision which was taken straightaway. He says that he is not confident that they will win the war I dont specify it is worth fighting for. And I dont think we can get out which belie with what he has said in source A.Source B is useful because it displays his true thoughts and feelings about going to war in Vietnam. Because the decisions to go into war are d one by Johnson it makes the source more reliable. However, because the source only tells us one point of view as to why they are involved in Vietnam War it limits its reliability and its not facilitative if youre looking for why they are involved in Vietnam. The source is privately said which makes it more reliable because its trustworthy and because thither is more chance of it being the truth. It is more useful because it shows what he unfeignedly think about Vietnam we acre a hell of a lot less it again contradicts with source A where he said we should act up on Vietnam this makes source A less useful. provided on the other hand source B is less reliable because we dont know who he had this private conversation with.I think source B on its own is not very useful because he doesnt say many reasons of why they got involved in Vietnam. But it is useful in way that it contradicts with source A and helps us think more about if source A is reliable.Source C is by Professor Noam Chom sky, he was an American critic of the war which means that he is not going to be positive about what the government is doing. He is less reliable because we dont know his background. He ahs got his own agenda possibly he can be Anti-American. Because he is a professor, people are more likely to believe what he says because he is knowledgeable. However, it doesnt mean what he says must be true. The source is less useful because we dont know where he got the information from, to make it more useful we need to know the derivation of his information.The professor emphasises the fact that the government didnt go to the war to help the South Vietnamese its our official truth now he is saying that this is what the public was told by the government, it was what everyone believed at that time. Its just not true in these lines what the professor actually means is that President Johnson is a liar. The US did not want an independent South Vietnam that was no longer dominated by America in these lines the professor is telling us that USA got involved in Vietnam because they did not want to lose the control over Vietnam and they wanted took flop to the Soviets during the Cold War.The source tells us that the US got involved in Vietnam for change over and money because if the South Vietnamese turn communist they wont trade with America, which means that they will have less economy. It could not intromit South Vietnam out of its orbit in these lines what he is saying is that America want to show the world its strength and it wants to keep control over Vietnam. It is about America being selfish and its greedy motives. This supports what Johnson said in source B, he only says he cares about Vietnam in source A.The source is said to public because he is being interviewed, the source is not very reliable because it only shows his point of view. The professor wants the public to know the truth or what he thinks is the truth. There is less chance that the media has changed the s ource. The source is useful because it shows us a different viewpoint about Americas involvement in Vietnam War. The fact that the professor has said it in public shows that he is trying to achieve publicity for himself by exaggerating the reasons.The source is useful because it displays that not everybody agreed to the war and some people criticised their own government. It is also good because it shows a different opinion on Vietnam War something we havent considered before. The source was spoken in October 1982 after the war has finished in the 1970s. Chomsky is criticising the government because they have lost the war, there is more chance of public believing Chomsky than government and they will think that the government has made a mistake. It is less reliable because it is a secondary source and he doesnt know what the real reasons were, he wasnt there at the time nor he wasnt part of the government.In my opinion, source C on its own is not very useful because ewe only get one persons viewpoint. But if it was interrogated with other sources it can be more reliable.In conclusion, I think from all these sources I have studied source B is more useful because it shows us what president Johnson felt at that time of war and he was the one who sent out soldiers to Vietnam. But in source A he could be lying to the public to justify his reasons because he cant say he sent troops down to Vietnam for his selfish motives. I havent chosen source C because I think that he is trying to gain popularity by criticising the government and that is his job.