Biological Determinism :: essays research papers

biologic Determinism1.      According to the author of the article "All in the Genes?", there is nointrinsic causality between genetics and intelligence. The author analysesdifferent aspects of biologic determinism, and supplies many examples, whichillustrate aspects of this problem that are being discussed since the timewhen these imaginations became popular. He does not agree with biological deterministthat the talented performance of a person imagines on genes inherit fromhis parents. There are a make out of different theories about intellectualcapabilities. All these theories reflect different points of views, depending onthe period of time the authors of these theories lived.     The author argues for the theory that in the nineteenth light speed ,artificial barriers in social hierarchy prevented people from achieving higherintellectual performance. In the end of XX century, in most places thesebarriers were removed by the democratic processes, and nothing artificial canstand between the congenital sorting process and social status of the people. Thesechanges can not be considered as historical because the age of democracy is justtwo degree centigrade years , and the time when inequality between classes and betweenpeople was a natural situation is almost as long as the recital of the world .     The author insists that there is no connection between milieualdifferences and genetics. In support of his idea the author state that anyCanadian student can perform better in mathematics than most ancient professorsof mathematics. The author comes to the conclusion that changes in a cultural milieu are the main factor that determines level of intellectualperformance, not inherited combination of parents genes . He argues thatgenetic differences that appear in one environment may easily disappear inanother. A theory that t wholey were raised in different social conditions willhave th e same(p) level of intellectual performance because identical geneticsconstitution was employ by the ideologist of biological determinism. The authorrejects this theory because from his point of view, all these cases cannot beconsidered as always reliable on a close look, in most cases, twins wereraised by the members of the same family or in other words, not in a diametrical black eye level of society. The author believes that there is no convincingmeasure of the social occasion of genes in influencing human behavioural variation.     During the argumentation of questions of biological determinism, theauthor supports his idea with numerous examples. He gives examples of supportersof bio determinism and outlines that these examples are not reliable. One of thefallacies of biological determinism is the offspring of IQ testing. According tosome scientist only 20% of performance depend on environment and other 80%