Ecological Theory and Beautification Essay

The bionomical theory in criminology maintains that the somatic environment where passel ar situated influences certain sympathetic carriages. The theory has its scientific advantages and disfavours when compared to the process of beautification, which is the process of visually improving a city or town peculiar(prenominal)ally one that is situated in an urban bowl.For the most part, the assertions of the ecological theory are non significantly numerateent on the dominant ethnic group living in a limited area, thereby pointing that the findings of the theory do non depend on subjective human relations but rather on the animal(prenominal) environment where they are located. It has a scientific advantage in the sense that it avoids the problems brought about by the relative circumstances of exactly who are living indoors the area. On the other commit, its disadvantage is that its findings noble horror rates with respect to affable disorganizationcan fluctuate amon gst being a cause or an effect.In a sense, high crime rates can result to social disorganization and, similarly, social disorganization can lead to high crime rates. Relying on the natural environment in interpreting human expressions is also problematic because doing so does non explain why some people in much(prenominal) areas commit certain crimes while others in the same areas do non. Beautification, however, is a relatively more(prenominal) stable theory than the ecological theory because, for example, urban beautification schemes by evictions are meant to address high crime rates and not the other way around.The ecological theory puts great emphasis on the fact of living within certain zones in an area as a primary reason for certain rates of crime. An earlier theater conducted by Shaw and McKay (2006) in 1942 suggests that the Zone 2 of an area contain more crime rates than any of the other zones primarily because this zone does not start out a settled community to b egin with which, in effect, prevents the institutionalization of clear(p) clean guidelines.In effect, the study in particular and the theory in general indicate that, regardless of those who settled in any of these zones, the behavior of the settlers as well as the rate of crime will confirm to depend on the corresponding zones. This argument is particularly interesting because it leaves the edition of human behavior on the physical environment instead on the people under study. According to Lowman (1986), there is the tendency to make cheating(prenominal) selections in utilize criminological theory in developing geographical perspectives on crime (p.81). If that is the case, ecological theory as applied to criminology faces the sterling(prenominal) disadvantagethe disadvantage of arriving at biased results. Worse, the distinction between the causes and the make of criminal activities may become blurred due to the tendency to not become objective. High crime rate can become a flexible factor, becoming a cause on one hand with social disorganization as its effect and becoming an effect on one hand with social disorganization as its cause on another.In fact, a separate study finds that there is no infallible connection between social class and crime and that more is nonetheless to be understood in these two distinct concepts (Tittle, 1983). From the perspective of ecological theory, areas are divided into zones and these zones are occupied by more or less the same people in terms of social class, thence social stratification in the physical environment.If there is no manifest connection between social class and the types of crimes committed by people in any of the prevailing social classes, there remains the bar of further asserting that there is an apparent link between the physical environment and the rate of crimes in the different zones. Thus, the main disadvantage of using ecological theory in interpreting human behavior within the confines of certain zones is that it uses a shaky foundation. More specifically, the theory does not address the inconsistencies between those who commit certain crimes within a specific zone from those who do not commit any crime at all.The main question is why do some people in Zone 2 commit theft, for instance, while some others do not? It appears that the physical environment does not hold a firm resolve to the task of explaining human behavior. Nevertheless, another study reaffirms the assertion of the ecological theory. In a study conducted by Tita, Cohen and Engberg (2005), it was found out that weakened gangs melt within select areas especially in urban slum locations, suggesting that in some cases the ecological theory may hold true.In decree to address the problem, it may be argued that urban beautification be taken into comity such as demolishing structures in slum areas and replacing them with visually pleasing structures. The advantage of adopting this measure is that it can literally remove the physical environment where these small gangs thrive. As a result, a portion of the area is altered and cleansed, in a manner of speaking, which is a faster origin than the possible solutions that can be taken from the ecological theory.A disadvantage of applying the ecological theory in providing a solution to the problem of small gangs is that it requires sufficient time and firm policies. For instance, the ecological theory may suggest that the income in these slum areas should be raised through specialized establishment programs and the law enforcement be made more stringent. While the solutions taken from the ecological theory are certainly needed, they call for serious implementation and conformable follow-up on their development. On the other hand, the disadvantage of adopting the beautification solution through eviction is that it raises ethical concerns.It is a quick fix that carries several moral consequences, chief of them humanitarian reasons. Both the ecological theory and the process of beautification have their corresponding advantages and disadvantages. The challenge is not to find which one is generally discover than the other but to determine which one applies best to a particular instance. Certain objections may be raised against either approaches, but they but remain significant methods in understanding certain types of human behavior such as criminal activities.ReferencesLowman, J. (1986). Conceptual Issues in the Geography of curse Toward a Geography of Social Control. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 76(1), 81-94. Shaw, C. R. , & McKay, H. D. (2006). teenaged Delinquency and Urban Areas A Study of Rates of Delinquents in coincidence to Differential Characteristics of Local Communities in American Cities. Oxfordshire Taylor & Francis. Tita, G. E. , Cohen, J. , & Engberg, J. (2005). An Ecological Study of the spot of Gang Set Space. Social Problems, 52(2), 272-299. Tittle, C. R. (1983). Social Class and wicked Behavior A Critique of the Theoretical Foundation. Social Forces, 62(2), 334-358.